Unedited Siberian Bigfoot Photos Finally Released
A Russian TV website featured this photograph of the Yeti back in 2011. The photos were taken on April 1st, near the mountain top of Sheregesh Green. It shows a bipedal a creature in the snow, covered with dark hair, walking behind some trees. With permission from Igor Bourtsev dept. of Hominidology. Russia, M.K. Davis was able to take the few frames of the creature taken by a Russian tourist and turned it into a GIF image. Check it out:
 |
| Click on image for full view |
The photos only show the backside of the creature. A member of the Russian Cryptozoology website, "SasquatchHunter" outlined the creature in the photos for us:
Peace!
ReplyDeleteParanoid symptoms may range from mild to severe. They depend on the cause but, generally, a person who is paranoid may:
DeleteBe easily offended
Find it difficult to trust others
Not cope with any type of criticism
Assign harmful meanings to other people’s remarks
Be always on the defensive
Be hostile, aggressive and argumentative
Not be able to compromise
Find it difficult, if not impossible, to ‘forgive and forget’
Assume that people are talking ill of them behind their back
Be overly suspicious – for example, think that other people are lying or scheming to cheat them
Not be able to confide in anyone
Find relationships difficult
Consider the world to be a place of constant threat
Feel persecuted by the world at large
Believe in unfounded ‘conspiracy theories’.
Three main types
Paranoia is associated with three principal conditions:
Paranoid personality disorder – considered the mildest type. Most people with paranoid personality disorder function well despite their mistrust of the world. The attitudes and behaviours associated with this disorder, when they become obvious, are often discovered to have been present for much of the person’s life.
Delusional (paranoid) disorder – characterised by the dominance of one delusion (false belief) without any other sign of mental illness. The person’s behaviour depends on which delusion they have. For example, a person who has a delusion of persecution believes that other people are spying on them or plotting to harm them in some way. Stalking can be the result of delusional (paranoid) disorder – for example, the person believes they are in a relationship with a movie star they have never met. In another case, a person may imagine they have a terrible illness, despite repeated reassurance from doctors.
Paranoid schizophrenia – considered the most severe type. It is characterised by strange delusions, such as believing that one’s thoughts are being broadcast over the radio. Hallucinations, especially bizarre ones, are also common to the condition. A person with paranoid schizophrenia often finds the world confusing and functions poorly without treatment.
Oh my dear word!! Are you still sore from yesterday's Russia drubbing?! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!
DeleteWhat a silly little nerd!!! Ha ha ha ha!!!
Paranoid symptoms may range from mild to severe. They depend on the cause but, generally, a person who is paranoid may:
DeleteBe easily offended
Find it difficult to trust others
Not cope with any type of criticism
Assign harmful meanings to other people’s remarks
Be always on the defensive
Be hostile, aggressive and argumentative
Not be able to compromise
Find it difficult, if not impossible, to ‘forgive and forget’
Assume that people are talking ill of them behind their back
Be overly suspicious – for example, think that other people are lying or scheming to cheat them
Not be able to confide in anyone
Find relationships difficult
Consider the world to be a place of constant threat
Feel persecuted by the world at large
Believe in unfounded ‘conspiracy theories’.
Three main types
Paranoia is associated with three principal conditions:
Paranoid personality disorder – considered the mildest type. Most people with paranoid personality disorder function well despite their mistrust of the world. The attitudes and behaviours associated with this disorder, when they become obvious, are often discovered to have been present for much of the person’s life.
Delusional (paranoid) disorder – characterised by the dominance of one delusion (false belief) without any other sign of mental illness. The person’s behaviour depends on which delusion they have. For example, a person who has a delusion of persecution believes that other people are spying on them or plotting to harm them in some way. Stalking can be the result of delusional (paranoid) disorder – for example, the person believes they are in a relationship with a movie star they have never met. In another case, a person may imagine they have a terrible illness, despite repeated reassurance from doctors.
Paranoid schizophrenia – considered the most severe type. It is characterised by strange delusions, such as believing that one’s thoughts are being broadcast over the radio. Hallucinations, especially bizarre ones, are also common to the condition. A person with paranoid schizophrenia often finds the world confusing and functions poorly without treatment.
Pro tip... Don't show your scars.
Delete(Whispers)
Russia.
; )
Delusional (paranoid) disorder – characterised by the dominance of one delusion (false belief) without any other sign of mental illness
DeleteIn need of a sense of control over events, conspiracies provide them with an explanation for those events over which they cannot exert control.
DeleteConspiracy theories, on the other hand, are tough to disprove. Their proponents can make the theories increasingly elaborate to accommodate new observations; and, ultimately, any information contradicting a conspiracy theory can be answered with, “Well sure, that’s what they want you to think.”
DeletePeople who suffer from Delusional Disorder, however, usually focus on a single errant or highly exaggerated misperception from which they are unable to get relief although a few sufferers may have more than one type of delusion.
DeleteWell that describes Joe pretty much.
DeleteJoe, I think you officially need medical attention
Not when I can provide you with data to back up my theorie, data you had a meltdown over, dear boy.
DeleteYeah... One word; Russia.
: p
"Conspiracies are tough to disprove"
DeleteAnd here in lies the meltdwown. Not like Russia having a governmental Yeti research scheme though... That took two seconds worth of reading properly.
Russia.
"In need a sense of control over events, conspiracies do not provide me with a preference of explanation of seemingly threatening events, over which I cannot exert control."
DeleteBeautiful!
Shut up meg
DeleteDelusional (paranoid) disorder – characterised by the dominance of one delusion (false belief) without any other sign of mental illness
DeleteRussia.
DeleteShut up meg
DeleteDelusional (paranoid) disorder – characterised by the dominance of one delusion (false belief) without any other sign of mental illness
DeleteA person who has run out of arguments may:
DeleteBe easily offended
Not cope with any type of criticism
Assign harmful meanings to other people’s remarks
Be always on the defensive
Be hostile, aggressive and argumentative
Be overly suspicious – for example, think that other people are blog admins or scheming to cheat them
Find relationships difficult
Attempt to attack ‘conspiracy theories’ because they pose no means of explanation and lack a means of control.
Oh... And Russia.
DeleteJoe has DD.
DeleteNot when I have supporting data. You have PD though... Check out the definition below.
Delete; )
Below? You don't even know the meaning of words?
DeleteSummed you up rather nicely... "the admins are out to get me!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRGGGGHHHH!!!!!"
DeleteNarcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is a personality disorder in which a person is excessively preoccupied with personal adequacy, power, prestige and vanity, mentally unable to see the destructive damage they are causing to themselves and to others in the process. It is estimated that this condition affects one percent of the population. First formulated in 1968, NPD was historically called megalomania, and is a form of severe egocentrism.
Delete^ the meltdown has begun
Deletemore crappy evidence confirming the nonexistence of bigfoot
you stole fizzy lifting drinks
you lose
good day
People who are diagnosed with a narcissistic personality disorder are characterized by exaggerated feelings of self-importance. They have a sense of entitlement and demonstrate grandiosity in their beliefs and behavior. They have a strong need for admiration, but lack feelings of empathy.
DeleteSymptoms of this disorder include:
Expects to be recognized as superior and special, without superior accomplishments
Expects constant attention, admiration and positive reinforcement from others
Envies others and believes others envy him/her
Is preoccupied with thoughts and fantasies of great success, enormous attractiveness, power, intelligence
Lacks the ability to empathize with the feelings or desires of others
Is arrogant in attitudes and behavior
Has expectations of special treatment that are unrealistic
Narcissists have such an elevated sense of self-worth that they value themselves as inherently better than others, when in reality they have a fragile self-esteem, cannot handle criticism, and often try to compensate for this inner fragility by belittling or disparaging others in an attempt to validate their own self-worth. Comments and criticisms about others are vicious from sufferers of NPD, in an attempt to boost their own poor self-esteem.
Delete5:07... Meltdown? Bro... You just got your ass handed to you? Prove it all nonsense, grow a pair and test the evidence. You know all about doing that, right??
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha ha!!!
Congressman Says 10 ISIS Fighters Have Been Apprehended At US border
DeleteTHE NEW NORM
Why all the fear mongering? I thought ISIS was a part of the CIA?
Deletejoe the troll got smoked
Deleteevery day the evidence piles up that there is no bigfoot
Obama uses ISIL to indicate that Israel does not exist
Deletehttp://www.smokeyjoesauces.co.uk
DeleteUK is Jihadists central
DeleteI like those photos
DeleteWho's trolling who ?
DeleteIt looks like a costume to me.
ReplyDeleteyou mean 'monkey suit'. we got lots of that
DeleteKeep in mind, it says the photos were taken on April 1st.
Delete5:08... You've got monkey suits, but not magic ones.
Deletewhat is this garbage? Proof you can draw around stuff in a picture?
ReplyDeleteDamn Son....I mean Shawn...you have posted questionable material before but this is by far the lowest. If these series of photos are taken as legit by anyone then it quickly becomes obvious why the..LOL...Big Foot Community will never be taken seriously.
And nor should it be. Too many crazies involved who don't take their meds. Too many who think raccoon and/or coyote scat came from The Big Fella. Too many lairs,scammers and frauds. To many TRUE BELIEVERS who are really pointless to discuss anything with.
For kids into it and maybe a young father I get the appeal. But when you notice it is no longer fun and becomes about money,who found what habituation site first,who sold the most books. Well you seem my point. It is just a scam carried on by a small but loud,well financed,actors,writers,producers,"Big Foot Experts",some who even have real credentials. But most know very little of what they speak for it is all speculation. Speculation of a mythological animal. Whose abilities seem to change when the narrative requires it.
I can't agree more with you until you resorted to suggesting the subject is mythological. Myths do not leave physical and biological sign, it's as simple as that. Your "narrative" would in fact account for an ever evolving field of study... A study that still does not know how to track the creature, and you have to remember that the field has largely been looking for a bipedal gorilla since 1967.
DeleteT'is all.
Tracks are inconclusive.
DeleteYou fail everyday.
Not for decades worth of wildlife biology it ain't.
DeleteLearn the basics.
link me to a peer reviewed paper made by a wildlife biologist in which alleged Bigfoot tracks are defined conclusive.
DeleteThere are no peer review papers on the tracks of a particular animal, only papers on methods of attaining tracks... Methods that have been applied in consistent transition when applied to this field.
DeleteWhen a Sasquatch are reported by professionals, then tracks found by said professionals, then hair... Occam's razor.
: p
tens of thousands of biologists and conservationists scouring the areas right where bf is supposed to be.
Deleteno tracks, no hairs, no scat, no howls, no clacks, no rock throwing, no sightings, no specimen
remember the search for the ivory billed woodpecker?
they turned that place inside out
zero evidence of bigfoot
Does that frequency account for those who have excelled all others in such fields to apply their expertise here? You forget that you dismiss the exact same professional equivalent when they present you actual tracks and hairs... This is classic denial, not being able to keep up with your own train of lies.
DeleteTuring a place inside out's gonna make a creature evading humans for it's safety to stick around for sure, right??
Plenty found, none caught, son.
No paper? Well that sums it up, no tracks and no Bigfoot then.
DeleteAnd here starts with the lies again. You say that there are no papers about tracks? Guess what, you lied again.
Deletehttp://scholar.google.it/scholar?q=animal+tracks&btnG=&hl=it&as_sdt=0%2C5
not tracks you blithering idiot
Deletetracks are easily hoaxed
fail
Typical straw man... Tracks would be a specific part of data in a peer review paper, learn the basics. Physical sign of the mountain gorilla didn't stop being a reality until it was documented by mainstream science decades later, check the history books and your own rhetorical logic, it's the equivalent of a ten year old's.
DeleteSurely you can't trust something that's been shown to be manipulated, right? Well that's your precious peer review process out the window. So not only do you safety net upon a process of research that simply hasn't reached that level of conclusion yet, but your main source is just as falsifiable as what you suggest said Sasquatch evidence to be.
Easy.
5:23...
Delete"There are no peer review papers on the tracks of a particular animal, only papers on methods of attaining tracks..."
Man, do I have to help you siolens read every day of your insignificant existences?
5:24... So can any submittable source in any judicial or scientific arena.... What's your point??
you are delusional
DeleteOr just cleverer than you?
DeleteBOYOOOOOOO JOE GOT THE BIGGEST SMOKING EVER TODAY
DeleteAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
I'm really curious to see with what moronic excuse he'll come up now.
My word...
DeleteYou also have a fossilised type specimen for those tracks, whilst Dinosaurs are an extinct... Please find an equivalent for a modern animal and you have a point.
Jesus, you people are seriously 16 or something...
It also appears I have to point out the differences between Palaeontology and wildlife biology.
Delete(Sigh)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006320793901968
Deletehttp://scotcats.online.fr/abc/identification/pumadogtracks.html
And that's just the first two results
SCHOOLED
Yes... (how many times?) we have specimen of mountain lions... And there is a requirement to differentiate between dog and mountain lion tracks... My word you are stupid, ha ha ha!!
DeleteAlso, your first source is to make individual animal identification by tracks, not to prove that mountain lions are real as a result of the tracks.
DeleteMy word... I can't believe I'm stooping this low...
Don't change argument, loser
Delete"There are no peer review papers on the tracks of a particular animal, only papers on methods of attaining tracks..." - Your word
Readily pointed out that you have papers about tracks of particular animals.
That's the end of the discussion and that settles in how much of a liar and of a clown you are.
SCHOOLED AND SEE YA, LATER
I don't care about excuses you'll come up with, what counts is only your starting statement, which finely shows to all how much of a buffoon you are.
DeleteSCHOOLED AND SEE YA, LATER, GO BACK IN TEARS TO YOUR MOMMY'S BASEMENT
"There are no peer review papers on the tracks of a particular animal, only papers on methods of attaining tracks..."
DeleteYes, differentiating from individual animals would fall into those methods. Palaeontology also doesn't count.
Man... You know when you're talking to children. I need an award for baby sitting this long and not getting paid for it.
(Sigh)
Differentiating from animals should be harder than differentiating between a real track and a fake one. Why paleontology should not count? Man what an idiot, it's not like if an animal is dead, its tracks don't count anymore. Man what an ass*hole.
DeleteSpecial bigfoot pleading at his best. I need better argument from you, PJ, this is becoming silly, come on!
Last chance...
It's simple... When a wildlife biologists finds tracks 50 miles into wilderness areas and puts his professional opinion to it... An opinion that was good enough for the UN prior to transitioning this filed, then that should be trusted with the same professional and proper impartiality. And we don't merely have that to verify tracks against hoaxing, we have dermals that transcend States and decades in line with what is expected of species traits.
DeleteIt's simple... Dinosaurs don't come under wildlife biology, which was the very fundamental starting point of the argument, numpty.
Special pleading is maintaining that scientific methods should be altered, bent and twisted to suit preconceived preferences and heuristical conclusions... Do you like exposing your own fallacies or something?
Oh and check the threads... I have an argument alright and it's doing rather well.
: p
Sorry, you blew up your last chance.
DeleteI'm not the one needing a rebuttal, old chum. You really do need the basics of a debate outlined for you, don't you?
DeleteBigfoot don't exist. deal with it.
DeleteIt looks like you who requires dealing with things, being here crying every day doesn't make a convincing case for your cause.
DeleteYou wouldn't be convinced even if God in person should come down to your basement telling you that Bigfoot ain't real.
DeleteYou're the most pathetic person in the world, and now I'm really off, ASS*OLE!
You're here trying to bully people and censor what people think because it threatens you; nothing more indicative of insecurity and deep resided issues with needing things under your control, like a spoiled little brat that's too stupid to back up his cancerous hatred & lies.
DeleteIt's simple... Test the evidence and prove me wrong. You can't, you're dumb and butthurt... And I'll be here every day to ensure you're meltdowns and feet stamping continues daily.
Joe tries to censor people that don't believe in bigfoot every day. All day. That is what he spends his life doing. Pretty sad when you think about it.
DeleteAnother bully, Joe. We've got Crampz and his Jr now. Jr. is much younger/immature and much less intellectual than the senior Crampz, but a bully nonetheless.
DeleteIs Crampz jr the one that said
DeleteEva r has a loose Butt Hole
from gettin too much CAULK??
That's a bad suit. It even has some sort of red collar, probably the suit prize etiquette.
ReplyDeleteYeah I think that's part of the zipper.
DeleteC'mon... that red dot is obviously the mouse pointer that MK used to draw the lines. Don't be so eager.
DeleteThe fact that the woman took a deep enough breath to let out that long scream shows premeditation. If she were truly startled the scream would have been much shorter.
DeleteWhatever that is... Damn! It's big!
ReplyDeleteHow do you know for sure it's big? Got a link to a size comparison?
DeleteBecause we want it to be! Mom says we're delusional. That's good right?
DeleteThat obliteration DWA is taking on the bff tho....
ReplyDeleteIs it as bad as PJ's obliteration here?
Deletehttp://makeagif.com/BaWXmg
ReplyDeleteProblem footers?
Damn.
DeleteThat's an EXACT match.
No problem, thanks... Rehearsing something can appear good enough for someone desperately seeking closure. It's when you sit down with he has rehearsed and found out his stories don't add up, the 'problem' is now yours.
DeleteOh... And we've checked, Bob can't describe the suit and can't find the film site.
DeleteAnd you don't qualify.
Could Gimlin find the film site? If so, then why did it take so much time and effort for stroofart and co. to find it? Couldn't they have just asked Gimlin?
DeleteThat's something you'd have to ask Steve. Gimlin can find the film site because he's shown Bobo around it.
DeleteOh and we've checked... You need to be told how to spell your name prooerly so you don't qualify.
ACHTUNG!
Delete* properly
Slip of the iPhone keyboard, old chum!
DeleteYes, some of us say the same thing about the PGF trackway; that it was sculpted/manufactured by Roger Patterson with no proof that the subject in the film made the prints we see on the film.
ReplyDeleteThere's more going on here than just the HH suit. Its the story itself that lends simlilarities to the fables of bigfoot, both pgf and bigfootery in general.
There's talk of going up to a river.creek to look for the creature.
Indigineous tracking companion (cue Bob Gimlin)
HH flips a truck off a mountain road. Patterson reproduced a Kuntsler drawing of a bf confronting a car on a mountain road. Patterson also told Harvey Anderson a bf lifted his VW on a mountain road.
HH creature tosses a hog. BF is rumored to have tossed a 600 lb-er
These may be just coincidences. Along with the coincidence that Roger happened to have filmed a realBigFoot while he was out hoaxing BigFoot. And no one has ever filmed a Bigfoot since. That's a lot of coincidences for a simple cowboy.
Could very well be that Rog saw the HH movie at one point and it may or may not have influenced his BF enthusiasm.
The HH suit wasn't perfect. It didn't have to be. The PGF suit wasn't perfect. It didn't have to be.
In the complete absence of the confirmed physical proof we cannot rule out a suit.
Nope!! It's all very well just cynically claiming the tracks were hoaxed, you would have to go some length to proving that of course. We can see that the casts are exactly that with which we see in the footage from comparison shots of the track way. Rene Dahinden didn't hold no favouritism to anyone in Bigfoot research, and he would have identified tracks being hoaxed immediately.
DeleteIf there are consistencies with Sasquatch encounters, this is because there are behavioural traits to various levels of curiosity of said subject when confronted with civilisation. Also... I'm sure you would find various consistencies with hunters of various other pursuits. it's a straw man argument with so many easily applied explanations... But these people aren't looking for all the answers, are they?
There are several anecdotal reference to Sasquatch confronting vehicles... Too many to count in fact. If you have taken the time to access such remote areas, you will no doubt concede that the best way to access such places in indeed via some form of transport. Let's not forget about the innumerable instances where Sasquatch have been reported by passing passengers in cars.
Again... Sasquatch are widely reported to steal hogs with a reported weight of what you refer to. When you have a hungry 1000lb plus Sasquatch that can invert trees into the ground as territory markers, a hog ain't no problem.
There is no evidence what so ever that Roger Patterson was out hoaxing Sasquatch, and it's a very rhetorical and embarrassingly bad argument to condemn Roger, merely because he was successful in doing that which you require so adamantly. There have also been matching specimens filmed since, none of which of the remarkable detail we see in the PGF, but matching specimens none the less; these being treated as a taboo of course and attacked with the same rhetorical, weightless presence of facts to help endorse any such negative connotations.
Oh and as for the Half Human suit... This has been taken apart comprehensively here;
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/bigfoot-and-case-of-missing-glow-stick.html
... Just one damning point of many for this case, is that the fur used on Half Human's back for example, is very long and shaggy, which obscures any specific body contours like muscles, folds or fatty deposits, but the PGF subject has hair short enough to see the body muscle masses, folds and fatty deposits. Nearly every shot of Half Human is always photographed under dramatic lighting (the ones that aren't like he examples shown up top show up so many inferior efforts at realism it's untrue), which allows for hiding a multitude of costume sins, but Patty was photographed under harsh direct sunlight nearly straight on her, the most unforgiving of lighting, so comparing photos of the two is problematic by the variable of lighting. And then we come to the spinal erectors, shoulder blades, neck muscles... All of which is perfectly put into perspective here;
http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/p-g44-buresh/
If Roger Patterson's alleged suit wasn't so perfect, then we'd have at least a known technique in costume manufacturing that accounts for the type of fur cloth you see on the PGF subject, and no desperate straw man comparisons to suits in the 50's cuts it.
Next?
Joe Fatz once said "extraordinary claims should not require extraordinary evidence".
DeleteExtraordinary claims should not require extraordinary evidence. We live in an age where string theory and quantum physics are getting to be way beyond the pails of anything paranormal, yet the psuedoskeptics suggest that a living breathing subject that leaves physical and biological clues after itself is nothing to consider in any realm of fact. Especially when this is determined by the same scientific methods that have excelled respected fields. Science doesn't prejudise or have a preconceived disposition to favour a preferenced conclusion... This is heuristics and actually what the scientific method was designed against. Nobody is suggesting this subject should be proven on the basis of the evidence alone, but if people are reporting, to which there is physical and biological evidence of an unknown primate, then what does that tell you? Science doesn't start at a body, it is a tool in investigating evidence leading up to that point.
DeleteJoe Fatz once said the who doesn't believe in aliens "should be put behind a wall and shot dead""""""
DeleteIt got a couple of laughs, upset the nerds though.
Delete^denial defensive modeo
Delete*mode on
DeleteJoe Fatz got banned for having a meltdown and calling everyone a PU$$Y.
DeleteDenial? Bro... I'm not the one sweating over facts and using rhetorical approaches somewhere I preach hate.
DeleteIn the complete absence of the confirmed physical proof we cannot rule out a suit.
DeleteWhen it's you confirming such, it leaves you resorted to things like coming here trying to reinforce your stance every day of your existence.
DeleteDay after day, after day, after day... Not too confident are you?
: p
Just like watching you get pounded into the ground.
DeleteThere's more of us than there are of you die hard, delusional bleebers, and I take comfort in that.
Check the threads bro, it seems to me the only things keeping you here are you requiring to reinforce your views (which if they were so obvious you'd have other things to do), and a little obsession with me because I've got you in my pocket.
DeleteEvery day you come here crying, and every day I use you as an example of mainstream stupidity.
I love it.
Comfort? Bro... If you were comfortable in your beliefs, you wouldn't have to express them so sweatily.
DeleteFunny as heck.
At what university is it taught that bigfoot is a living flesh and blood creature?
DeleteCrying?!?!?!?!?!
DeleteThat verified star is a permanent scar from your crying Joe. I guess your going to call us all cowards for welching on our bets next.
8:53... It's not, because at the moment people need to catch up with pioneers like Jane Goodall, Ian Redmond, Anna Nikaris, Zhoua Guoxing, Lyn Miles, Jeffrey McNeely, Chris Loether, Colin Groves and none other than George Schaller are very much enthusiastic about this subject (I wonder how many primates have been discovered between all them), not to mention open skeptics that promote the idea that there has to be something to reports like Esteban Sarmiento. Some of the universities that some of those experts are affiliated with are the Australian National University, Idaho State University, University of Tennessee, Oxford Brooks University, not to mention the IUCN - World Conservation Union, Human Evolution Foundation, Beijing Museum of Natural History and the Bronx Zoo-based Wildife Conservation Society.
Delete8:57... That verified star stands for the day you all crapped yourselves as soon as Shawn took your little quest for ruining the blog apart. No bigger coward than a creepy psycho Anon trying to steal identity, and when the realisation hits that Sykes is still studying... You folk are gonna cry, cry, cry.
I'm here, I will be every day, forever and there's not one thing you can do about it.
: p
Woah, what a great life awaits you!
DeleteGET LAID YOU LOSER!!!!
I'll be sure to let my misses know your sentiment when I jump into bed this evening.
DeleteSo Roger Patterson, who was out hoaxing bigfoot, just happens to film a bigfoot, which looks like a bloke in a suit and has the same proportions as the guy who later admitted he was in the suit.
ReplyDeleteProblem footers?
a person who is paranoid may:
DeleteBe easily offended
Not cope with any type of criticism
Assign harmful meanings to other people’s remarks
Be always on the defensive
Be hostile, aggressive and argumentative
Be overly suspicious – for example, think that other people are lying or scheming to cheat them
Find relationships difficult
Believe in unfounded ‘conspiracy theories’.
A person who has run out of arguments may:
DeleteBe easily offended
Not cope with any type of criticism
Assign harmful meanings to other people’s remarks
Be always on the defensive
Be hostile, aggressive and argumentative
Be overly suspicious – for example, think that other people are blog admins or scheming to cheat them
Find relationships difficult
Attempt to attack ‘conspiracy theories’ because they pose no means of explanation and lack a means of control.
Delusional (paranoid) disorder – characterised by the dominance of one delusion (false belief) without any other sign of mental illness
DeleteJoe, seems like you're around here just costantly.
DeleteWhat's your job?
This comment has been removed by the author.
Delete4:19... I told you, I'm an astronaut, special forces ninja master!
Deletesomething stupid
DeleteEh?
DeleteJoe, seems like you're around here just costantly.
DeleteWhat's your job?
Persecutory delusions are also a symptom of paranoid schizophrenia, which is a 'sub-type' of schizophrenia. Sometimes, people who are given a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia may see themselves as being particularly important in some way, and may believe this is the reason why they are being persecuted.
DeletePeople may be given the less common diagnosis of 'delusional disorder' if they experience persecutory delusions but do not experience hallucinations.
Anyone who experiences persecutory delusions is likely to withdraw from other people to try to protect themselves, and to avoid situations where they may feel threatened, like their basements or as close as possible to their home's desktop computer. They will probably spend a lot of time by themselves, worrying about their fears and especially what they fail to keep under their control, such as theories that threaten their security in society. If someone believes that other people are intent on harming them, they start to interpret actions and events in a way that confirms their beliefs, rather than considering alternative explanations... This can manifest in maintaining people who frequent social sites are in fact blog admins out to attack them and cause unrest and hostility for hidden agendas like traffic.
Yeah, Another good description of you, good job turd!
Persecutory delusions are also a symptom of paranoid schizophrenia, which is a 'sub-type' of schizophrenia. Sometimes, people who are given a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia may see themselves as being particularly important in some way, and may believe this is the reason why they are being persecuted.
DeletePeople may be given the less common diagnosis of 'delusional disorder' if they experience persecutory delusions but do not experience hallucinations.
Anyone who experiences persecutory delusions is likely to withdraw from other people to try to protect themselves, and to avoid situations where they may feel threatened, being reclusive to their basements or as close as possible to their home's desktop computer. They will probably spend a lot of time by themselves, worrying about their fears and especially what they fail to keep under their control, such as theories that threaten their security in society. If someone believes that other people are intent on harming them, they start to interpret actions and events in a way that confirms their beliefs, rather than considering alternative explanations... This can manifest in maintaining people who frequent social sites are in fact blog admins out to attack them and cause unrest and hostility for hidden agendas like traffic.
: p
... Came across a grammar mistake. I've never seen anyone diagnose themselves before, something tells me you are talking from personal experience.
DeleteMan... It must be scary living in a cyber world where you think every admin is out to get you... Staying indoors probably is the best thing for you.
"MOOOOOOOM!!! I'll have a meatball foot long, hold the salad and jalapeños!!!!"
a person who is paranoid may:
DeleteBe easily offended
Not cope with any type of criticism
Assign harmful meanings to other people’s remarks
Be always on the defensive
Be hostile, aggressive and argumentative
Be overly suspicious – for example, think that other people are lying or scheming to cheat them
Find relationships difficult
Believe in unfounded ‘conspiracy theories’.a person who is paranoid may:
Be easily offended
Not cope with any type of criticism
Assign harmful meanings to other people’s remarks
Be always on the defensive
Be hostile, aggressive and argumentative
Be overly suspicious – for example, think that other people are lying or scheming to cheat them
Find relationships difficult
Believe in unfounded ‘conspiracy theories’.a person who is paranoid may:
Be easily offended
Not cope with any type of criticism
Assign harmful meanings to other people’s remarks
Be always on the defensive
Be hostile, aggressive and argumentative
Be overly suspicious – for example, think that other people are lying or scheming to cheat them
Find relationships difficult
Believe in unfounded ‘conspiracy theories’.a person who is paranoid may:
Be easily offended
Not cope with any type of criticism
Assign harmful meanings to other people’s remarks
Be always on the defensive
Be hostile, aggressive and argumentative
Be overly suspicious – for example, think that other people are lying or scheming to cheat them
Find relationships difficult
Believe in unfounded ‘conspiracy theories’.a person who is paranoid may:
Be easily offended
Not cope with any type of criticism
Assign harmful meanings to other people’s remarks
Be always on the defensive
Be hostile, aggressive and argumentative
Be overly suspicious – for example, think that other people are lying or scheming to cheat them
Find relationships difficult
Believe in unfounded ‘conspiracy theories’.
Meltdown achieved!!
Delete; )
Where's your argument gone???
Hello??? Where's your argument? It's been downhill since the Russia debacle...
Deletehahhahaha look how this guy is so interested in my argument!!! What a pathetic life you must have!
DeleteWho has the meltdown now?
AHHAHAHAHAHA
And look how he reiterates after just 6 minutes!
DeleteCalm down bro, it's not like we all are like you without a life, a job and friends, give us time!
AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA WHAT A LOSER!
Come on bro... You must have an argument, right? Is the lack of not why you're posting large extracts of self descriptive diagnosis?
DeleteCome on bro, you must have an argument, right?
; )
People who are diagnosed with a narcissistic personality disorder are characterized by exaggerated feelings of self-importance. They have a sense of entitlement and demonstrate grandiosity in their beliefs and behavior. They have a strong need for admiration, but lack feelings of empathy.
DeleteSymptoms of this disorder include:
Expects to be recognized as superior and special, without superior accomplishments
Expects constant attention, admiration and positive reinforcement from others
Envies others and believes others envy him/her
Is preoccupied with thoughts and fantasies of great success, enormous attractiveness, power, intelligence
Lacks the ability to empathize with the feelings or desires of others
Is arrogant in attitudes and behavior
Has expectations of special treatment that are unrealistic
When you'll come up with a better argument than "governments worldwide cover up Bigfoot", then you might be taken seriosly. As of now you should only be taken to a medical centre, as the descriptions above fit very well your person
DeleteActually... And this might be news to you bro... But at any level of any debate, once you are presented with data it is now the responsibility of yours to counter that data and show that the premise is indeed inaccurate. You haven't done that and even had to be shown where you had read something wrong (ouch!)
DeleteYou haven't done that... You've merely posted ten meltdown posts calling me names, because you neither have the data nor the intelligence to manage it. Do you see how this works?
Where's your argument???
Stop crying and show me where I am wrong... It should be easy right?
Delete"In need a sense of control over events, conspiracies do not provide me with a preference of explanation of seemingly threatening events, over which I cannot exert control."
So, so true... And this is why you are angry. Nobody has had a meltdown other than you, because you cannot counter the information that has been put your way. You are running out of chances bro... Where's your argument. Come on, try and act like an adult...
Take a break joe, and wipe up those tears that are streaming down your face. And put some pants on.
DeleteUmmmmmm... No argument? Last chance bro...
Delete"There are no peer review papers on the tracks of a particular animal, only papers on methods of attaining tracks..." - Joe Fitz about the lack of papers about Bigfoot tracks.
DeleteSeriously? Never heard of analysis on Dinosaur tracks? Or analysis on biomechanics?
Man if you are dumb. Just an example.
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10420949409386390
"The first unequivocal example of a large tyrannosaur track attributable to the species Tyrannosaurus rex is an 86 cm long tetradactyl pedal impression assigned to Tyrannosauripus pillmorei ichnogen. et ichnosp. nov."
See? "Inequivocable". Peer reviewed paper. And from an animal lived 65 millions years ago.
Man if you are dumb.
Man what a schooling.
Yes, you silly boy... But we also have a fossilised type specimen for those tracks, whilst Dinosaurs are an extinct, please find an equivalent for a modern animal and you have a point.
DeleteJesus, you people are seriously 16 or something...
It appears I have to point out the differences between Palaeontology and wildlife biology.
Delete(Sigh)
Last chance...
DeleteGoing...
DeleteGoing...
DeleteGone... Better luck next time.
DeleteSmoked again^
DeleteThese must be the pics MIKE advised us about yesterday. Must say it is camoflauged against the background quite well.
ReplyDeleteChuck
mike got chumped again
DeleteChuck! I'm not so sure they are buddy! I'm gonna get in touch with Mike today, I'll let you know.
DeleteIs Bigfoot from another planet? YES. URANUS!!!
DeleteBigfoots controlled by the GRAYs
Deletea fake from Russia. This came out a couple years ago.
ReplyDeleteIs there any significance to the fact they were said to be shot on April 1st.
ReplyDeleteWasn't these already debunked as fake???? And why is the creatures head flat on top, they forget to cut his hat out for the pictures? ???
ReplyDeleteThey were all debunked. Bears and guys in suits.
ReplyDeleteThat is all.
Got bear with hands, feet and stride?
DeleteGot monkey suit?
What did you guys think of this week's Bigfoot Conspiracy newsletter?
ReplyDeleteGood stuff.
No, do you have a link?
DeleteHere's a recap:
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwGFalTRHDA
This is the reason why, NOBODY should show a Video, or a photo of a Big foot on this site! There's nobody qualified enough, to make a truthful analysis Only "Skeptics" and "Trolls" (that wouldn't know a Bear from a squirrel) with their limited low IQ immature remarks such as: "Man in a suit" or "it's a Bear". "Hoax" "Fake" etc
ReplyDeleteWhy bother?
But of course, Big bad-ass, attention seeker big foot researchers will continue to post their "Blobsquatches (Aren't they all) here, and the stupid comments continue!
Your right! Everybody is still waiting for that CLEAR Video of a Big foot at 30 yards. But even if that happens it still will be a Man in a suit, Hoax etc.
DeleteIt looks like the JREF sheep have lost their shepherd. Apparently gay magician James Randi has relinquished the JREF forum to a new skeptic religion group.
ReplyDeleteNobody seems to care.
DeleteI care biatch.
DeleteHow do you care and what exactly are you going to do about it?
Deleteim seeing real when i see the legs ,,but then i see the head And then im not so sure,,haft to ask johnny what antonio from face book think's of this one ?
ReplyDeleteThat tree sure can dance!
ReplyDeleteIn Mother Russian Siberia, the Almas put on a fake Sasquatch suit to fool the humans.
ReplyDeletecomrade we are the new mother russia
DeleteI smell fear on them Joe..look how they fight
ReplyDeleteYou said it, rumferlife. The paid disinformation trolls are in hysterics, because they know the jig is up.... Poor things.
ReplyDeleteHey Joe do U know who Dr.Jeff Meldrum is?
ReplyDeleteYES
Delete